法律对个体犯罪行为决策的影响和控制——以财产型犯罪为例  

Influences and controls on criminal decision-making by law—an example of property crime

作　　者：薛雄庭[1] 马皑[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学社会学院,北京100088

出　　处：《四川警察学院学报》2010年第6期22-31,共10页Journal of Sichuan Police College

基　　金：中国行为法学会2009年部级课题<行为的法律调控>;项目编号:03-11

摘　　要：对个体理性程度的不同认识,是期望效用理论和前景理论在个体行为决策上的重要差异。本文首先对犯罪行为理性假设在法学中的探讨加以介绍,然后以财产型犯罪为例,对期望效用理论在个体犯罪行为决策上已有的观点进行阐述。在此基础上,引入心理学中的前景理论,从编辑和评价两个阶段对个体的犯罪行为决策展开分析,进而提出应对策略。Expected utility theory and prospect theory differ mainly on individual rationality.Discussions on rationality by scholars of law were firstly presented in this paper;viewpoints on criminal decision-making of expected utility were then analyzed by taking an example of property crime.Based on the above,prospect theory was introduced for the analysis of criminal decision in terms of both edition and evaluating phases.Suggestions for controls on criminal decision-making by law were proposed.

关 键 词：理性 犯罪决策 期望效用 前景 

分 类 号：DF792.6[政治法律—诉讼法学]