检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《山东体育科技》2010年第4期66-68,共3页Shandong Sports Science & Technology
摘 要:在文献阅读、专家访谈以及问卷调查的基础上,对复旦大学田径队"自主培养"模式、华东师范大学田径队"联合培养"模式和上海体育学院田径队"一条龙培养"三种不同的培养模式进行比较与分析。上述三所高校田径队在培养高水平田径运动员的方式上各有特色,并都取得了一定的成绩。但通过研究和比较发现,三所高校田径队在培养模式上也存在着一些欠缺。鉴于我国田径水平的发展以及高校竞技体育发展的趋势,应该尽快探索出一套符合上海高校高水平田径队的培养模式,培养出更多的高水平运动员。Based on literature review,expert interview and questionnaire survey,this research compared and analyzed three different training models of high-level track and field team in Shanghai,including Fudan university's "independent training" model,East China Normal University's "joint training" model and Shanghai Athletic College's "package training".These three college track and field teams differ in the training models and all of them have made some success.However,through comparative analysis in the research,it seems that all the three models have some flaws.In view of the development of China's track and filed and the tendency of college competitive sports,we should find a training model that accords with Shanghai colleges' high-level track and field teams as soon as possible,so that we can train more high-level athletes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30