美国米兰达规则的适用及其对中国法治建设的启示——以2010年美国联邦最高法院鲍威尔案为例的评析  

Miranda Rule's Application in the United States and Its Implications for Building of Rule of Law in China:A review from Florida v.Powell Case decided by the US Supreme Court in 2010

作　　者：赵娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,教授博士南京210093

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2011年第2期107-113,共7页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：美国弗里曼基金会(Freeman Foundation in the USA)和美国伊利诺伊大学弗里曼学者项目(Freeman Fellows Program at the UIUC;USA)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：2010年鲍威尔案是近年来美国联邦最高法院关于米兰达规则适用的典型案例。通过判决有缺陷的米兰达警告有效,鲍威尔案对米兰达规则之标准的解释走向更加宽松的立场,使得米兰达规则的适用处于不确定状态,因而在总体上损害了米兰达规则的效力。中国需要在宪法层面明确规定刑事正当程序,中国司法应该在保护公民基本权利方面有所作为。Florida v. Powell decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2010 is a typical case of Miranda Rule＇ s Application in recent years. By deciding the legal status of the defective Miranda Warning in Florida v. Powell, the United States Supreme Court applied Miranda Rule with looser construction, which rendered Miranda Rule＇ s application uncertain and weakened Miranda Rule＇ s effectiveness as a whole. In China, Criminal Due Process Clauses should be provided in Chinese Constitution, and judicial authority should play an important role in protecting fundamental rights of citizens.

关 键 词：米兰达规则 米兰达警告 鲍威尔案 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]