检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙燕[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] 管忠震[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] 金懋林 李维廉[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] 李丽庆 石廷章[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] 周立中 隋广杰[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] 许立功[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] 宋恕平 许德凤 李容[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] 李扬 黄富麟[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] 张嘉庆 张和平[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] 鞠利雅
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院,协和医科大学肿瘤医院 [2]中山医科大学肿瘤防治中心 [3]北京市肿瘤医院 [4]天津市第二中心医院 [5]天津市肿瘤医院 [6]解放军301医院 [7]鞍山市第四医院 [8]哈尔滨医科大学肿瘤医院 [9]上海医科大学肿瘤医院 [10]山东省肿瘤防治研究院 [11]上海铁路中心医院 [12]西安医科大学附属医院 [13]青岛市立医院 [14]江苏省肿瘤防治研究所 [15]北京医科大学人民医院
出 处:《癌症》1999年第3期237-240,249,共5页Chinese Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的:观察奥沙利铂治疗晚期大肠癌的临床疗效和安全性。方法:根据GCP指导原则开展多中心Ⅱ期随机临床研究:A组奥沙利铂单药130mg/m2静脉滴注2h,每3周一次;B组奥沙利铂130mg/m2静脉滴注2hD1,加甲酰四氢叶酸钙(CF)200mg/m2+5氟尿嘧啶300mg/m2静脉滴注4hD1到D5,每3周一次。治疗3周期后评定疗效,有效病例在4周后确认疗效。结果:共收入114例,在可统计近期疗效的100例中,CR1例,PR26例,SD32例,PD41例,总有效率270%。A组36例单药治疗有效率为139%;B组64例有效率为344%。不良反应主要为恶心、呕吐、贫血和感觉神经毒性。对白细胞和血小板影响较小。结论:经考核奥沙利铂对大肠癌疗效和不良反应与欧洲的结果相近,和氟尿嘧啶合用疗效突出;多数病人耐受良好,是一治疗大肠癌有希望的新药。进一步考核,奥沙利铂和氟尿嘧啶联合有望成为治疗晚期大肠癌的首选方法。Objectives: Oxaliplatin(eloxatin, LOHP)has shown activity in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) both as a monotherapy and in combination with 5FU/FA in both chemonaive and pretreated paitents. The aim of this project was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of LOHP in Chinese colorectal patinets. Methods: A randomized phase study of this drug versus combination with 5FU/FA in ACRC patients was conducted in China for the first time in 15 centers. Arm A:LOHP 130 mg/m2, iv infusion for 2 h, repeat every 3 weeks; Arm B:LOHP 130 mg/m22 hD1 combined with folinic acid 200 mg/m22 h followed by 5fluorouracil 300 mg/m24 h D1 to D5, repeat every 3 weeks. Tumor assessment dosdone every 3 cycles and responders were confirmed four weeks later. Results: 114 ACRC patients entered the study, 100 cases evaluable for efficacy, one patient reached complete response, 26 partial response, 32 stable disease, and 41 with progression after treatment, the response rate for the whole group was 270%. There were 5 PR, 12 SD, and 19 PD in arm A, the response rate being 139%(5/36); while there were 1 CR, 21 PR, 20 SD and 22 PD in arm B, the response rate being 344%(22/64). The main adverse effects were nausea and vomiting, anemia and neurosensory toxicity, while bone marrow suppression was mild. Conclusion: The response rate in both arms was encouraging and comparable with the Europan data on LOHP activity. Combination treatment and monotherapy were equally well tolerated. Furthermore these results support the combination schedule as standard treatment for routine management of ACRC in China.
分 类 号:R735.340.5[医药卫生—肿瘤] R979.1[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.234.118