两种气囊面罩心肺复苏方法的临床观察  

Clinical observation of two methods with aerocyst face mask in cardiopulmonary resuscitation

作　　者：杨爱梅[1] 刘卫平[1] 杨春霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]汕头大学医学院第一附属医院普外科,515041

出　　处：《中国实用医药》2011年第3期15-16,共2页China Practical Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨三人气囊面罩心肺复苏方法与两人气囊面罩心肺复苏方法效果的比较。方法 85例患者随机分为3组,A组采用传统的一人行胸外按压一人控制气囊的操作方法,B组采用一人行胸外按压两人控制气囊的操作方法并与C组胸外按压加气管插管通气复苏效果进行比较。结果 A组成功率为36.0%,B组成功率53.3%,C组成功率53.6%。B组C组与A组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组与C组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论三人操作心肺复苏方法较两人操作心肺复苏方法成功率高,而与胸外按压加气管插管通气复苏效果进行比较则差异无统计学意义。Objective To compare the effect of method with aerocyst face mask manipulated by two mans or three in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods 85 patients were divided to three groups at radom. Group A：traditionary method that one press outside breast and one manipulate aerocyst. Group B： one press outside breast and two manipulate aerocyst. Group C： the method that pressing outside breast add tracheal intubation, then compared their effects. Results The achievement ratio was 36.0%in group A, 53.3%in group B and 53.6%in group C,which was different obviously in group B、C and group A（P0.05）,there was no obvious difference in group B and C（P0.05）.Conclusion the achievement ratio is higher in the cardiopulmonary resuscitation method which manipulated by three mas, and there is no obvious difference in this method and the method that pressing outside breast add tracheal intubation.

关 键 词：心肺复苏 面罩 气囊 

分 类 号：R459.7[医药卫生—急诊医学]