检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:舒香云[1] 王晓彦[1] 耿发云[1] 叶森娣[1] 叶静梅[1]
机构地区:[1]深圳市龙岗中心医院五官科,广东省518116
出 处:《中国护理管理》2011年第2期77-79,共3页Chinese Nursing Management
摘 要:目的:比较不同清洗方法对牙科手机机械性能的影响,探讨最佳清洗方法。方法:将全新牙科手机120支随机分成A、B、C3组,A组:采用纯手工的方法清洗;B组:采用超声清洗机清洗;C组:采用热清洗机清洗,1年后对3种不同方法清洗后的牙科手机机械性能进行比较分析。结果:A组手机转速、夹持力及锈蚀损坏都是最严重的,C组次之,而B组清洗的牙科手机损坏是最轻的。结论:采用超声波清洗机(B组)能较好地维护牙科手机的机械性能,建议推广使用。Objective:To explore the best cleaning method through comparing the effect on mechanical function of high-speed dental handpieces by different cleaning methods.Methods:One hundred and twenty new high-speed dental handpieces were divided into A,B and C groups randomly.Dental handpieces in group A were cleaned by manual method;ultrasonic cleaning system and auto-heating cleaning unit were used in Group B and C.Mechanical functions of high-speed dental handpieces were tested one year later.Results:The mechanical functions including rotation speed,clamping force and tarnishing of high-speed dental handpieces in group A were damaged most severely,then group C,and dental handpieces in group B were damaged most lightly.Conclusion:The use of ultrasonic cleaning machine could better maintain mechanical functions of dental handpieces.
分 类 号:R155.54[医药卫生—营养与食品卫生学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15