“沉思翰藻”锥指——兼论阮元释义同萧统原序之区别  

A Brief Analysis of "Chensi hanzao" —Differences between Ruan Yuan's Interpretation and Xiao Tong's Original Meaning

作　　者：卿磊[1] 谢谦[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第1期70-76,共7页Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition

摘　　要：梁萧统《文选序》"事出于沉思,义归乎翰藻",被普遍认为是其诸体共用的选文通则乃至文学之界说,这一观点首创于清代阮元。考之魏晋南朝文论及彼时总集编选的通例,这一解释似有违萧统原义。所谓"沉思翰藻",是萧统对"史论"这一文体为何列入《文选》的说明,从中体现的选文标准,也主要适用于史论一体,而非诸体通用。阮元对"沉思翰藻"的解释,其目的是将逐渐沦为道学附庸的文学重新独立出来,扶植与古文道统不相干的骈文,另立骈文文统,从而达到排挤桐城派以占据文章正宗的目的。Qing scholar Ruan Yuan pointed out that ＂Chensi hanzao＂（profound meaning and flowery language） was the general standard for selecting works in Wenxuan,which compiled by Xiao Tong in the Southern dynasty,and it was even the demarcation of all the literary forms in the Six dynasties.However,based on the literary theories and the general compilation rule at that time,such an interpretation seems to be inconsistent with Xiao Tong＇s original meaning.In fact,＂Chensi hanzao＂ is rather an explanation of why the literary form ＂historical criticism＂ is included than the general selection rule of the book.Ruan Yuan＇s explanation aimed at advocating the rhythmical prose and opposing the ancient Chinese prose of Tongcheng school.

关 键 词：《文选》 沉思翰藻 萧统 阮元 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]