审查逮捕程序改革的进路——以提高逮捕案件质量为核心  

Reforming Formal Arrest Procedures:Centering on Averting Wrong or Improper Arrest

作　　者：李昌林[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学诉讼法与司法改革研究中心,重庆401120

出　　处：《现代法学》2011年第1期114-122,共9页Modern Law Science

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究2009年度一般项目(西部和边疆地区项目)"基层检察机关实施刑事诉讼法状况实证研究"(09XJA820012);最高人民检察院2010年度课题一般项目"深化审查逮捕机制研究"(GJ2010C03)

摘　　要：我国审查逮捕程序存在的最突出的问题是错捕和不当逮捕比例过高,这主要是由于侦查机关没有对逮捕的全部条件承担证明责任和犯罪嫌疑人诉讼地位客体化造成的。调整批捕权的职权配置,将其交给法院行使,并不能达成以审查逮捕的正当程序控制逮捕的目标。我们应当以树立检察官在审查逮捕程序中的裁判者角色为核心,维系审查逮捕程序的诉讼构造,强化对逮捕全部条件的审查,改进检察机关审查逮捕的工作机制,创造犯罪嫌疑人及其律师在审查逮捕程序中发挥作用的条件,推行不捕理由双重说明机制,进而强化侦查机关对逮捕条件的证明责任,以实现审查逮捕程序的正当化,达到防止错捕、减少不当逮捕,并为公诉程序、审判程序纵深改革创造条件的目的。In China, high proportion of wrong or improper arrest becomes the acutest problem in formal arrest procedure which is mainly attributed to the failure of criminal investigation agency to satisfy arrest requirements and the ＂object tendency＂ of the status of the suspect in the proceedings. Conferring arrest power to jud- ges may not achieve the aim of making formal arrest in compliance with due process. Prosecutors should, in determining whether a formal arrest be made, play a key role and the suspect and his/her counsel, should also be given opportunity to defend his/her case. Where a no-arrest determination is made it should be justified in two different aspects and the criminal investigation agency should bear more burden to prove without doubt that the arrest requirements are fully satisfied so as due process is complied with. In this way the chance of wrong or improper arrest may be diminished and the purpose to further reform the prosecution as well as the trial procedure may also be effected.

关 键 词：逮捕 程序 正当化 改革 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]