论案外人异议之诉的废除  

The Abolition of the Action Filed by the Third Person on the Enforcement

作　　者：李先伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100086

出　　处：《政法论丛》2011年第1期118-124,共7页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：中国法学会2010年十大专项研究规划项目<完善中国特色社会主义法律体系研究>阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：以程序性争议与实体性争议的分类为基础的案外人异议之诉,并不符合民事诉讼的法理。案外人异议之诉和案外人执行异议,实系分别以强制执行法的当事人主义和职权主义为基础。因此,制度的法理基础完全冲突的案外人异议之诉和案外人执行异议,无法在强制执行法中并存,二者必废其一。强制执行中的当事人主义和职权主义本无优劣之分,但需要结合一国的国情予以选择。从当前的国情出发,我国应当废除案外人异议之诉。The Action filed by the third person on the enforcement based on classification between procedural dispute and substantive dispute is not in accordance with civil procedural jurisprudence. The action filed by the third person and the objection to execution filed by third person are based on adversary system and inquisitorial system in the civil judgment enforcement law. Therefore, the two systems can not coexist in the civil judgment enforcement because their theories are conflicting,and we must abolish one of them.There is no intrinsic difference between adversary system and inquisitorial system in the civil judgment enforcement law, which need to be combined with a country＇s choice. From our current national conditions, China should abolish the action filed by the third person on the enforcement.

关 键 词：当事人主义 职权主义 异议之诉 案外人执行异议 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]