检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:雷小林[1] 林远洪[1] 段廷旺[1] 李铁莲[1]
机构地区:[1]攀枝花学院附属医院肿瘤科,四川攀枝花617000
出 处:《肿瘤预防与治疗》2011年第2期74-76,共3页Journal of Cancer Control And Treatment
摘 要:目的:探讨吉西他滨联合高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗中晚期胰腺癌的疗效和安全性。方法:64例中晚期胰腺癌患者随机分为两组,A组:高强度聚焦超声治疗;B组:吉西他滨联合高强度聚焦超声治疗,比较两组的疗效、临床受益率和不良反应。结果:A组有效率43.8%、B组75.0%(P<0.05),A组临床受益率56.3%,B组84.4%(P<0.05);B组6个月、12个月生存率分别高于A组;两组不良反应差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:吉西他滨联合高强聚焦超声治疗中晚期胰腺癌具有更好的疗效。Objective: To investigate the effect and safety of gemcitabine combined with higb intensity focused ultrasound( HI- FU) treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: 64 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly divided into group A ( H/FU only) and group B( Gemcitabine + HIFU), the effect ,clinical benefit rates and adverse reactions were compared. Re- suits : The effective rates in group A and group B were 43.8% and 75.0% respectively( P 〈 0. 05 ). The clinical benefit rates in group A and group B were 56.3% and 84. 4% respectively( P 〈 0. 05). Survival time of group B were longer than group A;There was no significant difference of adverse reactions between the two groups( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion: Therapy of Gemcitabine combined with HIFU was more effective than HIFU only in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222