针刺透穴合电针二联治疗周围性面瘫临床观察  

Clinical observation on treating peripheral facial paralysis by massaging plus acusector

作　　者：陈英[1] 曹晶晶[2] 王德飞[1] 杨卫杰[2] 

机构地区：[1]漯河医学高等专科学校,河南漯河462002 [2]河南职工医学院,河南郑州451191

出　　处：《中医临床研究》2011年第3期64-65,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:探讨针刺透穴合电针治疗周围性面瘫的效果。方法:将70例患者随机分组,治疗组40例采用针刺透穴合电针治疗,对照组30例单用毫针刺治疗。结果:2组均在治疗3个疗程后统计:治疗组治愈28例,显效7例,好转4例,总有效率为97.50%。对照组治愈14例,显效9例,好转4例,总有效率为90.00%。两组治疗效果有显著性差异(P<0.05)。并且在同样治愈的病例中,组间差异非常显著(P<0.01),治疗组施治天数明显少于对照组。结论:针刺透穴合电针二联疗法治疗周围性面瘫有较好疗效。Objective： To investigate the effect of treating peripheral facial paralysis by massaging and acusector. Methods： 70 patients are randomly divided into 3 groups, 40 patients in treatment group are treated by massaging and acusector and 30 patients in control group are treated only by acusector. Results： Statistics of the two groups after 3 courses of treatment： in treatment group 28 cases are cured, there ia complete response on 7 cases, 4 cases get better, total effective rate is 97.5%. In control group, 14 cases are cured, there ia complete response on 8 cases, 4 cases get better, the total effective rate is 90.00%. Accordingly, there are great differences in the treatment efficiency of the two groups （P〈0.05）. Furthermore, in the cases cured in the two groups, the difference between the groups is very obvious （P〈0.01） and it is evident that tha days spent on treatment group are less than on control group. Conclusion： Massaging and acusector has a good effect on peripheral facial paralysis.

关 键 词：周围性面瘫/针刺透穴 周围性面瘫/电针治疗 临床 

分 类 号：R745.12[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]