检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑国 薛建军 范广洲[1] 董一平[1] 周定文[1]
机构地区:[1]成都信息工程学院高原大气与环境四川省重点实验室,四川成都610225 [2]国家气象中心,北京100081
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2011年第3期1419-1420,1426,共3页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家科技支撑计划课题(2008BAC44B03)
摘 要:在系统论述暴雨灾害评估体系结构的基础上,比较和分析了目前国内研究和应用较多的几类暴雨灾害评估理论和方法,如灰色关联法、概率统计法和主成分分析法,并以实际应用为例总结出它们各自的主要评估原理和优缺点。结果表明,灰色关联法对数据要求较低且计算量小,是比较简便易行的灾情评估方法;概率统计法以历史重现率来描述暴雨灾害等级是比较合理的方法;主成分分析法可以将多种致灾因子按权重简化成一个综合指标来描述暴雨灾害强度,比较方便直观。On the basis of the systematic analysis of the torrential rain disaster assessment system structure,this paper compared and discussed several types of torrential rain disaster assessment methods(gray correlation method,probability and statistics method and principal component analysis),and summarized their advances and weaknesses of each methods by taking actual application as an example.The results showed that Gray correlation method which had lower requirements for data and calculation was a more user-friendly disaster assessment method;Probability and Statistics was a more reasonable approach to describe the history reproduce rate of heavy rainfall disaster level;Principal component analysis can simplify several disaster-causing factors to a composite indicator to describe the intensity of torrential rain disasters,and it is more convenient and intuitive.
分 类 号:P458.121.1[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15