检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《学术研究》2011年第3期51-58,160,共8页Academic Research
基 金:中山大学台湾研究所的资助,特此感谢.
摘 要:21世纪以来,台湾地区的刑事司法进行了一系列改革。就整体制度层面而言,台湾地区在借鉴当事人主义具体制度的同时,坚守了大陆法系职权主义的基本特征和主要特色。从"扁家弊案"入手分析可知,台湾地区在保留大陆法系最重要原则的基础上,作出了具有原创意义的改革尝试,为新时期职权主义自身的发展完善提供了可能的思路,也为我国大陆地区的司法改革起到了借鉴作用。A series of criminal justice reform has been carried on since 21st century in Taiwan district.The judicial system in Taiwan district drew on the advanced experiences from the adversary system as well as maintaining its basic characters and main features of the ex officio system of civil law system from the overall system.It can be concluded that Taiwan district made an original trail on the reform while preserving the most important principles after analyzing the Bian family scandal,which provides a feasible idea for the self-improvement of the ex officio system in the new era.Also,the judicial reform in China's mainland can make use of it for reference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158