检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江省苍南县第二人民医院口腔科,苍南325802
出 处:《口腔医学》2011年第2期103-105,共3页Stomatology
摘 要:目的观察不同原因所致牙根吸收的治疗效果。方法选择由牙髓疾病、牙周疾病和正畸治疗引起的3种类型牙根吸收患者共138例,针对不同原因,分别采取相应的治疗方法。半年后复诊,再次拍摄X线片,记录牙根吸收程度,与治疗前相比较,临床疗效分为有效和无效。结果牙髓疾病、牙周疾病和正畸治疗引起的牙根吸收的治疗有效率分别为23%、95%、91%。牙髓疾病组牙根吸收的治疗有效率显著低于牙周疾病组和正畸治疗组(P<0.05),牙周疾病组和正畸治疗组无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论牙髓疾病引起的牙根吸收的治疗效果较差,而牙周疾病和正畸治疗引起的牙根吸收的治疗效果较好。Objective To observe therapeutic effecacies of root resorption caused by different pathogenic factors.Methods According to pathogenic factors,138 cases with root resorption were collected and were divided into three groups-pulp diseases group,periodontal diseases group and orthodontic treatment group.All cases were treated with different therapies according to pathogenic factors.After 6 months,dental radiographs were taken and degrees of root resorption were observed again.Study the changes of root resorption before and after the treatment.Clinical curative effecacies were divided into effective and ineffective.Results Of pulp diseases group,periodontal diseases group and orthodontic treatment group,the effective rate was 23%,95% and 91%,respectively.The effective rate of pulp diseases group was lower than those of periodontal diseases group and orthodontic treatment group(P0.05).There were no singificant differences between effective rates of periodontal diseases group and orthodontic treatment group(P0.05).Conclusions There were singificant differences among therapeutic effecacies of root resorption caused by different pathogenic factors.The therapeutic effecacies were relatively poor in pulp diseases group,while effecacies were better in periodontal diseases group and orthodontic treatment group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249