试论我国毒品案件中诱惑侦查的适用与监督——兼析最高人民法院“法〔2008〕324号”文件第六部分  

The Application and Supervision of Entrapping Investigation in Drug Cases——With Reference to Part Ⅵ of the(2008)324 Document Issued by the Supreme Court

作　　者：黄维智[1] 王永贵[1] 

机构地区：[1]成都市人民检察院,四川成都610041

出　　处：《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第2期111-121,共11页Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition

基　　金：2009年全国哲学社会科学“十一五”规划项目课题“心证形成过程研究--以刑事诉讼程序为主线”(09BFX075)阶段性成果

摘　　要：诱惑侦查作为一种特殊的侦查手段在打击犯罪尤其是在打击毒品犯罪等一些组织化和隐蔽性都比较强的犯罪中发挥着重大作用。在我国的毒品犯罪中,诱惑侦查一方面发挥着积极的打击作用,另一方面却因制度缺失、规范失衡等出现了一些公权力滥用、公民基本权利受到侵害的案例。最高人民法院2008年关于此问题的司法解释因存在基本概念混淆化、具体分类笼统化、犯意诱发合法化、诱惑侦查保密化等问题,缺乏可操作性。因此建议借鉴外国法中诱惑侦查适用与监督的成熟做法和思路,结合我国司法运行环境和体制,构建符合我国司法国情的适用与监督体系,以期杜绝因不当适用诱惑侦查所造成的危害,同时充分发挥此种特殊侦查手段在打击毒品犯罪中的积极作用。As a special investigative approach, the entrapping investigation plays a vital role in cracking down organized and concealed crimes, such as drug crimes. In our country, when combating drug crimes, the entrapping investigation indeed plays a positive role, but on the other hand, due to the lack of relative mechanisms and regulations, the abuse of public power and the violation of basic civil fights also appear in some cases. The judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court in 2008 aiming at solving such problems is not actionable for such defects as conceptual confusion, vague classification, legitimation of entrapment, and secrecy of entrapment, etc. Thus, according to the paper, China should draw on the mature practices and theories in foreign countries and consider the domestic judicial conditions and system to establish an application and supervision system of entrapping investigation, which could remove the impairment brought about by the misuse of entrapment and give full play to the approach in combating drug crimes.

关 键 词：诱惑侦查 司法解释 适用监督 缺陷完善 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]