检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州中医药大学附属清远市中医院,清远511500
出 处:《中国中医眼科杂志》2011年第1期22-26,共5页China Journal of Chinese Ophthalmology
摘 要:目的系统评价中医中西医结合治疗视神经炎的临床研究质量、治疗方案与疗效。方法计算机检索中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和中国医院数字图书馆数据库(CHKD),收集有关视神经炎的中医或中西医结合治疗与西医对照组治疗疗效比较的随机对照试验文献,评价纳入研究的文献质量,并进行Meta分析。结果符合纳入标准的RCT共12个,但其方法学质量均欠佳(C级);与对照组相比,中西医结合治疗组有明显的增效作用(OR=5.30,95%CI[2.97,9.44],P<0.01)。结论目前有关中西医结合治疗视神经炎的临床研究在科研方法学的应用方面仍有差距。本研究提示,中西医结合治疗视神经炎可能具有一定的增效作用,但不排除与样本量偏少、试验方法学质量低下及发表性偏倚有关;现有资料未描述严重不良反应事件的发生。本文结论有待根据高质量随机对照临床试验结果进一步证实。OBJECTIVE To systematically assess the methodological quality of clinical studies using integration of TCM-WM therapy to optic neuritis and to evaluate its efficacy.METHODS A comprehensive search strategy was designed to identify all randomized controlled trials(RCT)comparing integration of TCM-WM therapy versus western medicine therapy alone by searching for the CBM disc(issue 3) and CHKD.The methodological quality of the trials was assessed and a meta analysis was performed.RESULTS Twelve RCTs met the inclusion criteria.Methodological quality was poor(all the trials included were level C).Compared with the control group,the outcome of integration of TCM-WM increased the effect[OR=5.30,95%CI(2.97,9.44),P0.01].CONCLUSIONS The me-thodological quality of the trails using integration of TCM-WM should be improved.Based on the results of the review and the meta-analysis,integration of TCM-WM may have positive effects in patients with optic neuritis,although the evidence was weak.No serious adverse events were reported.Further well-designed clinical trials should be performed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31