检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江广播电视大学法学院,浙江杭州310012 [2]浙江省人民检察院,浙江杭州310012
出 处:《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第6期18-23,共6页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:浙江省社会科学界联合会2009年度研究课题(2009N32);浙江广播电视大学2009年度科学研究规划课题(XKT-09G02)
摘 要:司法实践中,民事检察诉权局限于抗诉方式,致使民事检察工作难以拓展,也与检察权的实质不相符合。如何突破困境是民事检察工作者必须考虑的问题。在对我国检察机关民事起诉权反思的基础上,我国应当继续积极推动《民事诉讼法》等相关法律的修订,合理设置民事检察权,从法律上明确检察机关的民事起诉权,并对其受案范围、起诉条件、诉讼中的调查取证权等做出具体的规定,以确保其能有效地履行宪法和法律赋予的职责。In the judicatory practice,the civil prosecutorial power is constrained by protest modes,which hinders civil procuratorial work and is against the essence of the prosecutorial power.How to settle the predicament is an important issue which should be considered by the prosecutorial workers. On the basis of reflection of the civil prosecutorial power in Chian,this paper holds the opinion that we should continuously promote the amendments of Civil Procedure Law and a series of relevant laws in a positive way,appropriately establish the civil prosecutorial power,clarify the civil action power of prosecutorial organs and specify accepting scope,prosecution conditions as well as the rights of investigation and obtaining evidence.With the above actions,we can make sure that the prosecutorial organs can effectively do their duty bestowed by the constitution and laws.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.152.135