李庄案的证据学拷问  

On the Evidence of Li Zhuang Case

作　　者：庄乾龙[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]山东工商学院政法学院,山东烟台264005 [2]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《石家庄学院学报》2011年第2期29-36,共8页Journal of Shijiazhuang University

摘　　要：李庄案凸显出的证据学问题值得拷问。本案中证人不出庭接受质证难以形成以证人证言为核心的证据锁链;而品格证据的不规范运用,不但不利于保障被告人合法权益,还徒增了司法的不严肃性;司法主体对刑事证明责任分配的不恰当理解,以"武断"式的刑事证明标准表现出来。构建关键证人出庭作证制度与品格证据规则,以实用主义的态度赋予辩方制约法官自由心证的权利,方能有望贯彻落实刑事证明标准与刑事证明责任分配制度,以期真正实现刑事审判解决纠纷的功能,树立刑事司法权威。The evidence of Li Zhuang case is worthwhile research in the criminal trial. In this case ,the witness does not appear to accept the cross-examination. It is difficult to form evidence chain around the core of witness tes- timony. The non-standard use of character evidence does not protect the defendant＇ s rights.＊ Moreover,it damages the seriousness of justice. Judicial body inappropriately comprehends the burden of proof result in the criminal stan- dard of proof of ＂arbitrary＂ type. The construction of key witnesses and the character evidence rules can implement the criminal standard of proof and the criminal proof responsibility allotment. We should give the defense rights to restrict the free proof of judge according to the pragmatism. This can truly resolve the dispute in criminal trials functions and establish the criminal justice authority.

关 键 词：李庄案 证人不出庭 品格证据 刑事证明标准 刑事证明责任分配 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]