陪都重庆抗战文学的文学史阅读与考察——对七部《中国现代文学史》书写病象的思考  

Reading and Investigation of the History of Anti-Japanese Literature in Chongqing,the Second Capital of the Current China——A Reflection on the Writing of the 7 Versions of The History of Modern Chinese Literature

作　　者：冯肖华[1] 

机构地区：[1]宝鸡文理学院中文系,陕西宝鸡721013

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第2期44-48,共5页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：陕西省社会科学基金项目(09J004)

摘　　要：自建国以来,《中国现代文学史》的编写与出版已有诸多成熟的文本,在这些史著中,对于抗战文学内容的秉笔直书及相应篇幅的编排都存在着近似的"同一律"病象,即重墨于解放区文学,轻疏于国统区文学,尤其淡化陪都重庆抗战文学的书写,反映出文学史家们在这一问题上后著复前著,一路步尘沿袭的顺延、回避修史理念,使得陪都重庆抗战文学史实长期处于遮蔽状态。如何重新认知陪都重庆抗战文学史实的双重意义,进一步去反思、寻找造成这些问题的症结,厘清和重新修正史家的修史理念,是本世纪文学史家们面临的重要课题。Since the founding of the People＇s Republic of China,several sophisticated versions of The History of Modern Chinese Literature have been composed and published.However,all these different versions of literary history showed a common symptom in compiling the size of selections and writing about Anti-Japanese literature： they all devoted the heaviest description to literature in liberated areas but the slightest to literature in Kuomintang-governed regions,particularly that in Chongqing the second capital.This showed those literary historians＇ overcautious and indecisive attitude and style of blindly following the established and avoiding the classic conception of history writing.As a consequence,the history of Anti-Japanese literature in Chongqing the second capital has remained hidden for a long time.Thus it is one of the leading tasks to the literary historians in this century to re-perceive the double meaning of historical facts of Anti-Japanese literature in Chongqing,further reflect the causes for such problems and clarify and re-adjust our conception of history writing.

关 键 词：陪都重庆 抗战文学史实 病象思考 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]