检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省成都市双流县第一人民医院,610200
出 处:《当代医学》2011年第10期144-145,共2页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的评价美罗华(Rituximab)联合CHO(PR-CHOP)治疗CD20阳性B细胞性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的临床疗效及不良反应。方法回顾性分析治疗的39例初治CD20阳性B细胞性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者。其中R-CHOP组19例,采用R-CHOP方案化疗;CHOP组20例,采用CHOP方案化疗。6个疗程后比较两组的临床疗效及不良反应。结果 RCHOP组完全缓解率为73.7%(17/19),总有效率为89.5%(14/19);CHOP组分别为45.0%(9/20),75.0%(15/20),两组完全缓解率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组不良反应差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 R-CHOP方案治疗CD20阳性B细胞性非霍奇金淋巴瘤疗效更好,且未增加不良反应。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and side-effects of CHOP combined with rituximab(R-CHOP) in treating CD 20 positive B-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).Methods We retrospectively analyzed 39 newly diagnosed patients with B-cell NHL who treated in our hospital.19 cases in R-CHOP group were treated with R-CHOP while 20 cases in CHOP group were treated with CHOP.The efficacy and side-effects of these two groups were evaluated after 6 courses of treatment.Results The complete remission(CR) rate and total effective rate in R-CHOP group was 73.7%(14/19) and 89.5%(17/19),while the complete remission(CR) rate and total effective rate in CHOP group was 45.0%(9/20) and 75.0%(15/20).The complete remission(CR) rate between the two groups had statistical significance(P0.05),while the side-effects differences between the two groups had no statistical significance(P0.05).Conclusion Treating CD 20 positive B-cell NHL with R-CHOP is more effective,while there are no additional side-effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15