检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]连云港市第一人民医院核医学科,江苏连云港222002
出 处:《中国医学影像学杂志》2011年第3期237-240,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
摘 要:目的用半定量方式探讨不同病理类型孤立性肺结节在SPECT摄取18F-FDG的差异。资料与方法回顾性分析69例孤立性肺结节SPECT显像结果,半定量法(T/N)研究不同病理类型肺结节摄取18F-FDG的差异。结果恶性病变摄取18F-FDG比值明显高于良性病变,鳞癌摄取18F-FDG比值高于腺癌,差异均有统计学意义;良性病变之间差异无统计学意义。结论 18F-FDG摄取值半定量分析对孤立性肺结节良、恶性鉴别有重要意义,对恶性病变病理类型有一定预测价值。Purpose To investigate the difference of 18↑F-fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG) uptaking between different pathologic types of solitary pulmonary nodules(SPN) on SPECT imaging by semi-quantitative analysis.Materials and Methods The SPECT data of 69 cases of SPN were retrospectively reviewed and the semi-quantitative T/N was calculated to compare the difference between different pathologic types.Results The 18↑F-FDG uptaking value in malignant disease was statistically higher than in benign lesions(P〈0.05).The 18↑F-FDG uptaking value in squamous carcinoma was statistically higher than in adenocarcinoma(P〈0.05).There was no statistical difference among benign lesions(P〉0.05).Conclusion The semi-quantitative analysis of 18↑F-FDG uptaking value is helpful for SPN diferential diagnosis and malignancy prediction.
关 键 词:硬币病变 肺 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 单光子 氯脱氧葡萄糖F18
分 类 号:R734.204.5[医药卫生—肿瘤]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249