检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉市医疗救治中心病理科,湖北武汉430023 [2]湖北省襄樊市中心医院病理科,湖北襄樊441021
出 处:《中国医药导报》2011年第10期48-49,共2页China Medical Herald
摘 要:目的:比较简易液基涂片技术与传统涂片技术在痰液细胞学的制片效果及痰癌细胞的诊断阳性率。方法:收集患者清晨咳嗽后的痰液置于封闭塑料瓶中,分为两组,一组做传统涂片,另一组用简易液基涂片方法制片。光镜下观察比较两者的制片质量并评估优劣。结果:110例标本中,临床最后诊断42例(38.18%)为阳性,68例(61.82%)为阴性。简易液基涂片中找到癌细胞34例(30.91%),可疑癌细胞5例(4.54%)中除1例临床诊断为阴性要求随访外都为阳性患者;传统涂片中找到癌细胞20例(18.18%),可疑癌细胞14例(12.73%),其中5例液基涂片诊断同为可疑,另7例临床为阳性患者,另2例临床诊断为阴性需要随访。结论:简易液基涂片技术较传统涂片技术能有效地提高痰液细胞学制片质量及痰癌细胞诊断的阳性率。Objective:To compare the positive ratio of simple liquid based smear and traditional smear in sputum cytology.Methods:The deeply inside sputum of patients in the morning were collected,and were divided into two groups.One was done by the traditional cytology,the other was done by simple liquid based smear.The results under the microscope and the qualities of both slides were compared to evaluate which was best.Results:110 cases of samples in the finally clinical diagnosis,42 cases(38.18%) for positive,68 cases(61.82%) for negative.Simple liquid base smear found in 34 patients(cancer cells,30.91%),suspicious cancer cells in 5 patients(4.54%) in all the cases clinical diagnosis for negative requirements follow-up outside all positive for patients;traditional smear found in 20 patients(18.18%) cancer cells,suspicious of 14 cases(12.73%),of which 5 cases were diagnosed with liquid base smear as suspicious,the other 7 cases clinical tested positive for the patient,another 2 cases clinical diagnosis for negative need follow-up.Conclusion:Simple liquid based smear is much better than traditional smear in sputum cytology slide quality and positive ratio of carcinoma cells.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229