IPS-Empress Ⅱ铸瓷贴面与Targis树脂贴面的临床疗效比较  

Clinical evaluation and comparison of IPS-Empress Ⅱ ceramic veneers and Targis resin veneers

作　　者：杨旭[1] 邓燕[1] 张恒[1] 任英华[1] 章彦彦[1] 郑蓉[1] 杨芬[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东医学院附属深圳南山医院口腔科,广东深圳518052

出　　处：《临床口腔医学杂志》2011年第3期168-170,共3页Journal of Clinical Stomatology

摘　　要：目的:比较IPS-Empress Ⅱ铸瓷贴面和Targis树脂贴面修复后3年的临床疗效。方法:选取14名患者制作IPS-Empress Ⅱ铸瓷贴面50个,22名患者制作Targis树脂贴面86个。使用改良CDA/Ryge标准对两种贴面修复后三年的颜色匹配、表面质地、边缘着色和完整性等指标进行评价,比较两者的临床成功率和患者满意度。结果:IPSEmpress II铸瓷贴面3年存留率为94.0%,Targis贴面为90.7%;IPS-Empress Ⅱ铸瓷贴面修复患者主观满意度为92.0%,Targis贴面为88.4%;两者在颜色匹配、边缘着色和边缘完整性方面没有明显差异;在表面质地上IPS-Empress Ⅱ铸瓷贴面优于Targis树脂贴面。结论:IPS-Empress Ⅱ铸瓷贴面和Targis树脂贴面均是良好的修复系统,IPS-Empress Ⅱ铸瓷贴面的表面性能优于Targis树脂贴面。Objective：To evaluate the clinical application of a heat-pressed glass ceramic system of IPS-Empress Ⅱ and Targis resin veneers.Method：50 IPS-Empress Ⅱ veneers were made for 14 patients and 86 Targis veneers were made for 26 patients.After three years,color match,surface texture,marginal discoloration,and marginal integrity of two veneer systems were clinically examined following modified CDA/Ryge criteria.The clinical success rate and patients satisfication were calculated.Result：The success rate was 94.0% for IPS-Empress Ⅱ veneers and 90.7% for Targis veneers.The patient satisfication of the former was 92.0% and the latter was 88.4%.There was no difference between the two kinds of veneers on the color match,marginal discoloration and marginal integrity except the surface texture.Conclusion：Both IPS-Empress Ⅱ veneer and Targis resin veneer were successful methods of veneer restorations.IPS-Empress Ⅱ veneer has better surface texture than Targis veneer.

关 键 词：贴面 瓷 树脂 

分 类 号：R783.4[医药卫生—口腔医学]