医学专家关于医学专业目录调整的意向调查  

Adjustment in discipline/specialty catalogue in medical fields: Consensus points from an expert consultation

作　　者：吴鸿翔[1] 汪玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学公共卫生学院儿少卫生学教研室,公共卫生安全教育部重点实验室,上海200032

出　　处：《中国学校卫生》2011年第3期280-282,共3页Chinese Journal of School Health

摘　　要：目的研究我国现行医学领域学科目录存在问题、如何调整及其影响因素,为目录的合理调整提供政策建议。方法组织并对全国60个医学院校的1 197位医学专家进行问卷调查。结果 58.5%专家认为应增设护理学;57.2%的专家认为应增设特种医学;69%专家认为应拆分临床医学,且41%专家选择拆分方案是将临床医学拆分为内科学类、外科学类以及医学技术若干一级学科。临床医学较非临床医学专家更倾向拆分临床医学一级学科(P<0.01)。临床医学硕士专业学位授权获批较晚或学位授权级别相对低学校的专家倾向于拆分临床医学一级学科。结论医学学科目录调整可增设护理学、特种医学、医学技术一级学科;临床医学一级学科可拆分为若干一级学科。ObjectiveIn an effort to cast a fresh eye on adjustment in discipline/specialty catalogue in medical field,an expert consultation on effective discipline/specialty catalogue with experts from various academic organizations were carried out.MethodsA questionnaire survey was carried out among 1 197 experts in 60 medical schools in China.ResultsAmong the 1 197experts,58.5% agreed to establish Nursing as senior subject;57.2% agreed to establish Special Type Medicine;69% considered that Clinical Medicine should be subdivided,and 41% chose the item that Clinical Medicine was subdivided to several subjects including Internal Medicine Genus,Surgery Genus and Medical Technology.The experts from Clinical Medicine preferred to subdivide the senior subject of Clinical Medicine（P〈0.01）.Those experts from schools authorized to award professional master degree of clinical medicine later,preferred to subdivide the senior subject of Clinical Medicine,so as in the schools with lower degree.ConclusionSome senior subjects might be established in Discipline and Specialty Catalogue of Medical Fields,such as Nursing,Special type Medicine and Medical Technology while Clinical Medicine can be subdivided to several subjects.

关 键 词：目录 教育 医学 态度 回归分析 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学] R8[医药卫生—临床医学]