检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]防灾科技学院,河北三河101601 [2]北京正邦兴业建筑技术开发有限公司,北京100083
出 处:《防灾科技学院学报》2011年第1期104-109,共6页Journal of Institute of Disaster Prevention
摘 要:"形而上"、"形而下"是中国古代哲学中的基本范畴之一。古人借此推演出很多指导人们生产和生活实践的重要思想,并取得一系列的成功。中国古代科学的发展曾遥遥领先世界数千年之久——在结构抗震性能上也是如此,这些都与华夏先贤的哲学思维不无关系。本文通过一些实例的对比,重点分析了古今建筑结构抗震哲学思想的一些异同,这些异同可以从"形而上"和"形而下"的范畴来进行概括。通过概括对比,我们不难从中得到一些有益的启示。The metaphysical and under-metaphysical thoughts were a couple of important conceptions in ancient Chinese philosophy.And ancient Chinese philosophers had deduced many important ideas from these conceptions and gotten a lot of success in everyday practice.The development of ancient Chinese science and technology had kept ahead in the world for thousands of years,including the earthquake resistant structures—and these were also dependent upon the philosophical thinking of those philosophers.With some examples of architectures,the ancient and modern philosophical thoughts in building of earthquake resistant structures are compared in this paper.And the comparison shows that most of the thoughts can be summarized into metaphysical or under-metaphysical conception.Furthermore,the comparison can also give some useful ideas for the building(design) of earthquake resistant structures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28