检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国河南省驻马店市精神病医院,463000 [2]驻马店市第一人民医院
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2011年第3期290-291,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的探讨心理干预对消化性溃疡患者焦虑和抑郁情绪的影响。方法将180例消化性溃疡患者随机分为对照组和干预组各90例。对照组接受常规的药物治疗;干预组除常规的药物治疗外,给予心理干预,内容包括支持心理治疗、个别心理指导、生物反馈放松训练、团体心理治疗,观察6周。采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)于治疗前后进行调查。结果心理干预后,干预组SAS、SDS得分均明显低于对照组(t=10.85,11.09;P<0.01),干预组临床疗效优于对照组(χ2=5.27,P<0.05)。结论心理干预能有效改善消化性溃疡患者焦虑和抑郁情绪,提高临床疗效。Objective To explore the effect of psychological intervention on anxiety and depression of the peptic ulcer patients.Methods A total of 180 cases with peptic ulcer were randomly divided into control group(n=90) and intervention group(n=90) for an observation of 6 weeks.Patients in control group were accepted the routine medicine therapy.In addition to medicine therapy,the patients in the intervention group were also given psychological intervention,including supportive psychotherapy,individual psychological guidance,physical and mental relaxation training and group psychological therapy.Then self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) and selfrating depression scale(SDS) were used to investigate before and after treatment.Results After psychological intervention,the scores of SAS and SDS in the intervention group were obviously lower than those in the control group(t=10.85,11.09;P〈0.01).The clinical effect was obviously better than those in the control group(χ2=5.27,P〈0.05).Conclusion Psychological intervention can effectively improve anxiety and depression of the peptic ulcer patients,and enhance clinical efficacy.
分 类 号:R749.72[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117