检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北方交通大学,北京100044
出 处:《铁道工程学报》1999年第3期26-29,共4页Journal of Railway Engineering Society
摘 要:本文采用现行混凝土及石砌体极限承载力的两种计算模式,对现行标准设计不同截面(矩形、圆形和圆端形)的混凝土桥墩及石砌桥墩进行了比较计算。结果表明,截面受压区应力成矩形分布的方案概念明确,符合设计习惯,且计算结果与现行《桥规》接近,能体现“转轨”原则。Two kinds of calculation methods of the limit bearing capacity of the concrete members and the stone filled members were calculated and compared by the current standard design in which different shape of cross seciton members were considered.The results show that the method number one whose stress of the compressed region of the cross section is assumed to be distributed in a rectangular shape has a clear meaning,is in accord with the habit of design and close to the current bridge code.It reflects the rules of the changing of the code and could be recommended.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15