试论我国民事诉讼证据收集制度的模式选择  

On the Choice of our Country' s Civil Evidence Collection Mode

作　　者：吴如巧[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《河北法学》2011年第5期144-149,共6页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：重庆大学"中央商校基本科研业务费"资助(CDJRC10080005)

摘　　要：作为我国民事诉讼证据收集制度完善的首要问题,在证据收集制度的模式选择方面,应当对我国诉讼体制及社会的现实状况予以充分关照。在此基础之上,我国未来的民事诉讼证据收集模式应当选择协作式模式。协作式证据收集模式的法理基础因证据收集主体与对象的不同而有所不同,但二者存在深层次的共同法理依据,即诉讼各方主体所负的"诉讼协力义务"。同时应注意"诉讼协力义务"与"诉讼促进义务"的区别。As the most important issue in perfecting our country＇s civil evidence collection system,the choice of evidence collection mode should coordinate with our litigation system,and also should adjust to the realities of the society.Based on the forgoing factors,we should choose the collaborative mode of evidence collection in the future.The legal basis of the collaborative mode is different because of the difference between the subject and the object of evidence collection.However,they have the same in-depth basis,ie ＂duty to collaborate＂ theory.At the same time,we should pay attention to the difference between ＂duty to collaborate＂ and ＂duty to promote＂.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 证据收集 模式选择 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]