检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢仁桃[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南人文科技学院体育科学系,娄底417000
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2011年第4期428-429,共2页Chinese Journal of School Health
基 金:湖南省教育厅科研项目(10C0842)
摘 要:目的探讨同伴教育防控中学生校园伤害的干预效果,为更有效地防控中学生校园伤害提供指导。方法在娄底市4所初级中学随机抽取12个班级共680名学生,按单纯随机的方法将其中6个班级共计348名学生作为实验组(同伴教育组),另6个班332名学生作为对照组。实验组采用同伴教育方法进行干预,而对照组不采取任何干预措施。干预前后对2组学生均运用同一调查表进行现场问卷调查。结果在伤害防控知识掌握方面,同伴教育组干预后各项答对率均有大幅度提高(P值均<0.01),对照组干预前、后差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05);在伤害发生率方面,同伴教育组干预后各项受伤率显著下降(P值均<0.01),对照组干预前、后差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。结论同伴教育是一种新的有效的教育方法,在防控中学生校园伤害方面可以起到一定作用,值得推广。Objective To explore the effects of peer education on injury prevention and control intervention.Methods A total of twelve classes were randomly chosen from 4 junior high schools.Three hundred and forty-eight students in 6 classes were taken as the experimental group(peer education group),and 332 students of the other 6 classes as the control group.Peer education was given to the experimental group as intervention while the control group did not take any interventions.The students in both groups were questionnaire surveyed before and after intervention.Results After the intervention,on the aspect of knowledge about injury-related prevention and control,the correct answer rate of peer education group was significantly increased than before(P〈0.01);on the aspect of prevalence rate of injury,peer education was decreased significantly(P〈0.01);no significant difference was found in the both aspects before and after the intervention(P〉0.05).Conclusion Peer education is an effective method to prevent and control injury,which is worthy of promotion.
分 类 号:G479[文化科学—教育学] R179[文化科学—教育技术学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42