反垄断民事诉讼:设置“行政前置”程序必要与否?  

Antimonopoly Civil Litigation:Should We Executive Pre-trial Procedure?

作　　者：闫卫军[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学法学院,上海200083

出　　处：《河北法学》2011年第4期144-149,共6页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：我国有部分学者认为我国在反垄断民事诉讼程序中应当设置"行政前置"程序。但考察国外相关立法的发展以及我国的司法实践发现,国内外的立法和司法实践的经验均不支持这一主张。而这一主张本身也不符合一般法理、司法效率和实现相关立法目的的需要。同时,主张设置反垄断民事诉讼"行政前置"程序的理由事实上也不成立。Some experts in our country call for an executive pre-trial procedure for antimonopoly civil litigations. However review of abroad developments in legislation and internal development of judicial practice reveal that both of them do not support such a position, which is also disarmed by applying the common jurisprudence, the requirement of judicial efficiency and the realization of legislation purpose in China. Meanwhile the reasons for the position is not firmly standed.

关 键 词：反垄断 民事诉讼 行政前置 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]