检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾凡昌[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031
出 处:《现代法学》2011年第2期55-64,共10页Modern Law Science
摘 要:法律人格具有作为"主体资格"与"权利客体"这两个矛盾范畴方面同时使用的特征,这是人格权立法难点之所在。西方人格权发展的基本路径是:法律人格在初期具有浓厚的身份性,然后,立法对法律人格进行了伦理性确认和权利能力的抽象规定,继而以人格权的形式出现,并以日益扩张的工具性立法技术对其保护。西方社会深厚历史、社会渊源与哲学理论根基促使人格被纳入民法调整的视野和领域。这一人格权的历史发展线索对于我国当下的人格权立法无不具有启迪作用和借鉴意义。Personality is comprised of two opposite aspects: having the capacity as a subject of law and as the object of rights,to which difficulty in making laws concerning personality rights attributes much.In the West,publicity rights in their early stage bore a heavy color of personal status.Subsequently,with their ethicality and functions ascertained and abstractly provided by statutes,they assumed the form of personality rights and were protected by ever extending legislative techniques.The solid historical,social and philosophical foundation of western society contributed a great deal to the incorporation of publicity rights into the regulatory realm of civil law.In respect of China's publicity rights lawmaking,a study of the history of the evolution of personality rights in the West is of inspiring and enlightening significance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40