检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第1期50-54,72,共6页Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:肖建国教授主持的国家社会科学基金项目"不动产强制执行程序研究"(10BFX051)的阶段性成果
摘 要:《物权法》对抵押权实现做出了不同于《担保法》的规定。该法第195条第2款直接规定了抵押权人在达不成实现方式协议时,可以请求法院拍卖变卖抵押物。但这个创新性的民事实体法条文,究竟该适用我国民诉法中何种程序,目前还处于争议状态。从民诉法理论分析和比较法角度看,抵押权实现应当适用民事非讼程序,而非讼程序的制度构建正是文章的重点。Different stipulations are made in Property Law and Guarantee Law when it comes to the means of realizing the mortgage right in China.Section 2 of article 195 of Property Law stipulates that : where no agreement on the means of realizing the mortgage right is achieved,the mortgagee may require the people's court to auction or sell off the mortgaged property.However,which procedure of the procedural law should be used to put this innovative article of civil substantive law into application is still in dispute at present.With theoretical analysis and comparision,the present author reckons that civil noncontentious procedure should be applied to realizing the mortgage right,and the concrete system of this noncontentious procedure is also brought out in this paper.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28