检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第1期93-98,共6页Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(70802007);北京市自然科学基金项目(9092008)资助
摘 要:文章首先分析了税收激励对服务业生产率的作用机制,然后利用2001-2008年的全国跨省面板数据测算了我国服务业全要素生产率(TFP)的变化,并实证检验了税收激励政策对服务业TFP变化的影响。研究结果发现:第一,2001-2008年我国服务业TFP变化很小;第二,税收激励能显著促进中国服务业TFP和技术效率的提高;第三,现阶段,税收激励对我国服务业技术进步作用不显著,创新投入的税收激励政策效果不佳,加大对服务业技术投入和创新投入的支持力度应该是今后的税收政策重点。The mechanism of tax policy on productivity of China's service industry was discussed in this paper firstly.Then,based on the cross-province panel data of the year of 2001 to 2008,the author measured the changes of Total Factor Productivity(TFP) of China's service industry,and studied the influence of the tax preference policy to the TFP of the service industry.The research shows: firstly,TFP of China's service industry of the year of 2001 to 2008 varied slimly;secondly,tax preference policy could greatly promote TFP and technical efficiency of China's service industry;thirdly,tax preference policy did not perform too well on the technical improvement of China's service industry,and the effect of the tax incentives on the creative investment is not very sound.Therefore,enlarging the technical investment of China's service industry and strengthening the support of the creative investment should be the key point of the future tax policy.
分 类 号:F062.9[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.35