《福尔摩斯》报“五卅惨案”家属抚恤金问题报道札记  

Political Events and Public Opinions in Tabloids of Modern Shanghai-focusing on the pensions to the victims' families in May 30th massacre as reported in Sherlock Holmes

作　　者：洪煜[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学人文与传播学院副教授,200234

出　　处：《史林》2011年第2期23-29,187,共7页Historical Review

基　　金：上海市重点学科中国近代史(S30404);上海市普通高校人文社科重点研究基地(SJ0703)阶段性成果

摘　　要：五卅惨案发生后,在对被难家属的救济发放过程中发生了抚恤金侵吞问题。对此上海舆论界一片沉寂,集体失语,大多报刊取沉默态度,没有给予披露及相关报道。惟有《福尔摩斯》等上海小报"言大报之不敢言,登大报之不敢登",大量跟踪报道,使该事件真相大白于天下,显示出近代上海小报舆论的社会监督功能。"大报看广告,小报看新闻",就是当时对上海各类小报社会监督功能的最好评价。After May 30th massacre,there was the problem of embezzlement in the process of giving out pensions to the victims' families.Most of the newspapers in Shanghai kept silent and didn't release relevant information.However,tabloid paper like Sherlock Holmes made a large number of tracking reports on the embezzlement and revealed the truth of the massacre.'If you want to see advertisements,go to read major newspapers;if you want to read news,go to read the tabloids'-such is the best evaluation for the social functions of all kinds of tabloids in Shanghai at that time.

关 键 词：五卅惨案 抚恤金侵吞问题 上海小报舆论 

分 类 号：K262[历史地理—历史学]