检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第四医院CT室,石家庄市050011
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床》2011年第5期280-283,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
基 金:国家科技支撑计划项目(编号:2007BAIO5B05);河北省2009年医学科学研究重点计划基因资助(编号:20090511)~~
摘 要:目的:结合术后病理结果比较螺旋CT与MRI对结直肠癌术前N分期的诊断价值.方法:选取河北医科大学第四医院2008年12月至2009年12月经手术病理证实的结直肠癌患者共53例.采用GE Light Speed Pro 32螺旋CT行平扫及增强扫描.使用Simens Avanto 1.5 T 超导型磁共振仪,均采用相控阵线圈行平扫及增强扫描.本实验数据采用SPSS 11.5软件进行统计分析.CT和MRI对结直肠癌术前N分期与术后病理对照采用χ2检验,并计算每种诊断方法的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、符合率等数据.结果:CT、MRI扫描和磁共振弥散加权成像(MR-DWI)扫描3种方法检查淋巴结分期结果与组织病理学结果的符合率分别为56.6%、58.5%、73.6%.MR-DWI扫描的敏感度及阴性预测值最高,分别为92.3%和88.2%,CT为75.0%和66.7%,MRI扫描为42.6%和57.1%.MR-DWI扫描的特异度为55.6%,介于常规MRI(74.1%)扫描和CT(41.3%)之间.MR-DWI扫描的阳性预测值为66.7%,略高于CT(51.4%)和MRI(61.1%)扫描.经χ2分析,MR-DWI扫描诊断结果与组织病理结果具有中等相关性,Kappa值为13.927(P=0.001);CT和常规MRI扫描的诊断结果与组织病理结果无显著相关性,Kappa值分别为1.128(P=0.288)和1.585(P=0.208).结论:通过对比CT、常规MRI和MR-DWI在结直肠癌淋巴结分期的诊断表现,显示出MR-DWI诊断结果与病理学结果具有较好的相关性,提示MR-DWI能够更准确地预测结直肠癌区域淋巴结转移情况.Objective: To compare the value of CT and MRI in preoperative N-staging of colorectal carcinoma ( CRC ) and to compare the imaging findings with the pathological findings. Methods: The study involved 53 histopathologically confirmed CRC patients. Plain and contrast scanning were performed by a GE Light Speed Pro 32 spiral CT scanner. All MRI examinations were performed by a 1.5 Tesla Siemens Avanto Superconduction MRI unit. Different techniques were proposed for phased-array surface coil MR/in both plain and contrast examinations. All analyses were conducted with SPSS 11.5. Chi-square ( χ^2 ) trend test was used to test the relationship between the results of MRI and CT. Results: The coincidence rates of CT and MRI and MR-DWI findings with the results of N staging and histopathology were 56.6 %, 58.5 % and 73.6%, respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value ranked the highest in the MR-DWI scan: 92.3 % and 88.2%. The values were 75 % and 66.7 % in CT, and 42.6 % and 57.1% in MRI, respectively. Z2 test showed that there was a moderate correlation between the results of MR-DWI scanning and histopathology results. The kappa value was 13.927 ( P = 0.001 ). No statistical correlation was found between the diagnostic results of CT and conventional MR/scan (without DWI) and pathologic examination. The Kappa values were 1.128 (P = 0.288 ) and 1.585 ( P = 0.208 ), respectively. Conclusion: MR-DWI is more accurate than CT and conventional MRI in diagnosis of CRC. MR-DWI can accurately predict the presence of nodal metastasis in CRC patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249