机构地区:[1]天津医科大学 [2]天津医学高等专科学校 [3]天津医科大学总医院普外科,天津市300052
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床》2011年第5期288-291,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
摘 要:目的:检测结直肠癌中转录因子Ets-1和整合素α6β4的表达,探讨其在结直肠癌浸润转移中的作用及临床意义。方法:选取2007年6月至2008年6月间天津医科大学总医院外科40例结直肠癌手术标本为研究对象,分别采用荧光实时定量PCR和免疫组织化学方法检测肿瘤和切端组织中Ets-1和整合素α6β4的mRNA和蛋白表达水平,并结合临床病理资料进行统计学分析。结果:Ets-1和整合素α6β4在肿瘤组织中的mRNA表达水平和蛋白表达水平均高于切端组织(P<0.05);Ets-1 mRNA的表达与肿瘤的组织学类型、肿瘤部位、大小及分化程度未见相关性(P>0.05),伴淋巴结转移者Ets-1 mRNA的表达明显高于不伴淋巴结转移者,其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),Ets-1 mRNA表达与大肠癌浸润深度及Dukes分期存在正相关,伴随肿瘤浸润深度和临床分期的增加,Ets-1 mRNA表达明显增加,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);淋巴结转移者的Ets-1蛋白阳性率为91.3%(2l/23),无淋巴结转移者为58.8%(10/17),两者差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),伴随肿瘤浸润深度和Dukes分期的增加,肿瘤组织中Ets-1蛋白阳性率也显著增加(P<0.05),而Ets-l蛋白表达水平与病理类型及分化程度未见相关性(P>0.05);结直肠癌中Ets-1的表达与整合素α6β4的表达呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论:检测结直肠癌内Ets-l和整合素α6β4的表达可作为评价肿瘤侵袭转移、判断预后的重要指标,Ets-1可能成为结直肠癌基因治疗新的靶点。Objective: To detect the expression of Ets-1 and integrin α6β4 in colorectal carcinoma ( CRC ), and to explore the role and clinical significance of these transcription factors in the invasion and metastasis of CRC. Methods: Surgical specimens from 40 CRC patients were used in this study. The mRNA and protein levels of Ets-1 and integrin α6β4 in CRC tissue and the surgical marginal zone were assayed using real-time quantitative PCR and immunohistochemical methodsl Statistical analysis for the results of the assay and clinicopathologic data was conducted. Results: Both mRNA and protein expression of Ets-1 and integrin α6β4 were significantly higher in CRC tissue than in the marginal zones ( P 〈 0.05 ). There was no correlation among the Ets-1 mRNA expression, histological type, location, size of the CRC, or the extent of differentiation ( P 〉 0.05 ). The level of Ets-1 mRNA expression was significantly higher in the cases with positive lymph nodes than in the cases with negative nodes. There were significant differences between the two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). There was a positive correlation among the expression of Ets- 1 mRNA, depth of CRC infiltration and Duke' s staging ( P〈 0.05 ). The positive rate of Ets-1 protein detection was 91.3% ( 21/23 cases ) in the cases with nodal metastasis and 58.8% ( 10/17 cases ) in the cases without nodal metastasis. There were significant differences between the two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). There was a significant increase in the positive rate of Ets-1 protein in CRC, with a corresponding increase in tumor invasion depth and Duke's staging ( P〈 0.05 ). Integrin α6β4 protein expression was similar to that of ETS-1. No relationship was detected between integrin α6β4 expression and pathologic type or extent of tumor differentiation ( P 〈 0.05 ). A positive correlation between Ets-1 and integrin α6β4 in CRC was confirmed ( P〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: Ets-1 and integrin α6β4 expression in CRC may be an import
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...