检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东风汽车公司花果医院小儿弱智脑瘫治疗中心,湖北省十堰市442049
出 处:《医学理论与实践》2011年第8期869-870,876,共3页The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
摘 要:目的:观察痉挛肌治疗仪对痉挛型脑性瘫痪儿童大运动功能的影响。方法:70例痉挛型脑性瘫痪患儿随机分为两组,其中观察组40例,对照组30例。在综合康复基础上,观察组加用痉挛肌治疗仪治疗。采用粗大运动功能评价量表(GMFM)及改良Ashworth量表(MAS)进行评定。结果:治疗3个月后,两组治疗前、后组内比较,两组患儿的运动功能和肌痉挛均较治疗前明显改善(P<0.01)。而治疗后两组比较,观察组更优于对照组(P<0.05);两组疗效比较,观察组总有效率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:痉挛肌治疗仪治疗小儿脑性瘫痪能更加明显改善痉挛状态,提高运动功能。Objective:To observe the effect of spasm therapeutic equipment on the gross motor function in children with spastic cerebral palsy(SCP).Methods:Seventy patients with SCP were divided randomly into a trial group(40 cases)and a control group(30 cases).On the base of comprehensive convalescence in two groups,in the trail group forty patients were treated with spasm therapeutic equipmen.The effect was evaluated by gross motor function measure score(GMFM)and modified Ashworth scale(MAS).Results:After three months,The motor function and spasticity were improved significantly after treatment in all patients of two groups(P0.01).However,a comparison between the two groups revealed that the curative effect of the trial group was superior to that of the control group(P0.05),and the total effective rate of the trail group was higher than the control group(P0.05).Conclusion:The method with spasm therapeutic equipment could improve more significantly spasticity and the motor function.
分 类 号:R742.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.152.81