检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭素然[1] 伍新春[1] 郭幽圻[1] 王琳琳[2] 唐顺艳[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学心理学院,北京100875 [2]河北能源职业技术学院,唐山063004
出 处:《心理发展与教育》2011年第3期329-336,共8页Psychological Development and Education
摘 要:以331名大学生为被试,采用反刍思维量表、孤独感量表和情绪智力量表,考察了三者之间的关系,以说明反刍思维既可以对个体情绪产生消极影响,也可以对其产生积极影响。结果表明,在中国大学生群体中,反刍思维的反省维度得分高于抑郁相关和沉思维度得分;反刍思维总分及三个维度都可以正向预测孤独感;反刍思维的抑郁相关维度负向预测情绪智力水平,反省维度正向预测情绪智力;情绪智力分别在反刍思维、抑郁相关和沉思三个变量与孤独感之间的关系中起着调节作用,可以缓解三个变量对孤独感的预测作用。Rumination could influence both positive and negative affection. In present study, we used ruminative response scale, UCLA scale developed by Russell and emotional intelligence scale to test the relations among rumination, loneliness and emotional intelligence. Data from 331 undergraduates showed that, for Chinese undergraduates, score of reflection dimension was higher than the scores of depressed related and brooding. The total score as well as three dimensions were positively related to loneliness. The depressed related dimension was negatively related to the level of emotional intelligence and the reflection dimension was positively related to emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence moderated the effects of rumination, depressed related, and brooding on loneliness.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

