检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学附属新会人民医院,广东江门529100
出 处:《腹腔镜外科杂志》2011年第4期281-282,共2页Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
摘 要:目的:对比分析腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术与传统根治术的临床疗效。方法:回顾分析2002年1月至2009年12月施行的56例腹腔镜和86例传统结直肠癌根治术的临床资料,对比分析其手术操作、并发症及术后情况等。结果:8例中转开腹,占14.3%。腹腔镜组平均住院时间多于开腹组[(8.3±1.4)d vs.(5.2±1.6)d]。腹腔镜组术中无其他脏器损伤、大出血、气体栓塞等并发症发生。术后1例肠漏,2例肠粘连,无一例死亡。随访12~36个月,平均18个月,所有患者均未发现切口种植,局部复发和远处转移差异无统计学意义。结论:腹腔镜结直肠癌根治可达到传统结直肠癌根治术的效果,且患者创伤小,康复快。Objective:To compare therapeutics of laparoscopic colorectal radical resection with the traditional treatment.Methods:The surgical procedure,complications,and postoperative conditions in 56 cases of laparoscopic surgery and 86 cases of conventional surgery for colorectal cancer between Jan.2002 and Dec.2009 were compared.Results:Eight of 56 laparoscopic operations were converted to conventional surgery(14.3%).The average hospital stay in laparoscopic group was more than conventional surgery group [(8.3 ± 1.4) days vs.(5.2 ± 1.6) days].The patients in laparoscopic group had no other organ injury,bleeding or air embolism.1 case suffered from postoperative intestinal fistula,2 cases got intestinal adhesion,no deaths occurred.During following-up of 2-36 months(mean 18 months),there was no significant difference in incision planting,local recurrence and distant metastasis between two groups.Conclusions:Laparoscopic colorectal cancer radical resection can achieve the effects of conventional surgery with less trauma and more rapid recovery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104