工作心理控制源量表中文译本的信度与效度  

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Versionof Work Locus of Control Scale

作　　者：余善法[1] 张锐[2] 

机构地区：[1]河南省职业病防治研究所,郑州450052 [2]河南职工医学院

出　　处：《工业卫生与职业病》1999年第5期288-291,共4页Industrial Health and Occupational Diseases

基　　金：河南省科技攻关计划项目! 981170413

摘　　要：应用工作心理控制源量表（ ＷＬＣＳ） 、职业紧张指标ＯＳＩ－ ２ 和ＮＩＯＳＨ 一般工作紧张问卷对２３５ 名管理人员进行测试， 研究工作心理控制源量表中文译本的信度和效度。结果发现ＷＬＣＳ包括两个因子， 其子量表平均项目－ 总分相关系数较高（ｒ＞ ０－６０） ， 且均有显著性意义（ Ｐ＜ ０－００１） ， 内部一致性系数在可接受水平以上， ＷＬＣＳ及其子量表与工作环境中很多紧张因素、紧张结局变量显著相关。ＷＬＣＳ及其子量表高低评分者之间工作满意感、心理卫生、自尊感评分存在着显著的差异。结果表明ＷＬＣＳ具有较高的信度和效度。To study the reliability and validity ofthe Chinese version of Work Locus of Control Scale ( WLCS) , 235 managers wereinvestigated by WLCS, OccupationalStressIndicator (OSI- 2) and NIOSH Generic Job Stress Questionnaire. The results showed that the WLCSconsists of two factors (effort and luck) ,the average item total correlation coefficients of subscales are above 0-60 ( P< 0-001) . Cronbach○s αcoefficientsofthe effortand luck subscaleare 0-71 and 0-82 respective ly , with atotalof 0-67 . WLCSand its subscales are significantly correlated with stressfactors,job satisfaction, mental health, negative affect and self esteem . The managers score low in WLCS, theireffortsubscaleratesscore higher pointsin jobsatisfaction, mentalhealth and self esteem , while those score high , only job satisfaction doesinluck subscale. The resultsindicated thatthereliability and validity of Chinese version of WLCSare acceptable.

关 键 词：心理控制源 量表 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R395.6[哲学宗教—心理学]