检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛占苍[1] 张秀明[1] 安永辉[1] 黄振辉[1] 赵会颖[1] 刘培茹[1]
机构地区:[1]河北省石家庄市第一医院,河北石家庄050011
出 处:《中国危重病急救医学》1999年第10期630-632,共3页Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基 金:河北省石家庄市科委指导性课题
摘 要:目的:探讨危重型脑出血预后与局部自由基浓度的方法:对危重型脑出血行CT 引导下血肿抽吸引流并侧脑室引流,设计对照组单管血肿抽吸引流,同时分别测定血清、血肿及脑脊液内丙二醛(MDA)及超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)总活力。结果:血肿及脑脊液内局部MDA 及SOD水平均明显高于血清(P均< 0.01);双管引流术的临床疗效明显优于单管引流(P< 0.01),但SOD及MDA 水平无差异(P均> 0.05)。结论:脑损伤局部高自由基水平是病情严重程度的指标之一;双管引流法能明显缩短患者清醒时间。Objective:To investigate the relationship between the prognosis and concentrations of local free radicals in severe intracerebral hemorrhage.Methods:Under the guidance of CT,dual tube drainage of both hematoma and lateral ventricle was performed in patients with severe intracerebral hemorrhage.Meanwhile,single tube drainage of hematoma in patients served as controls.Malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were determined in serum,hematoma and cerebrospinal fluid.Results:It showed that the levels of MDA and SOD in local hematoma and cerebrospinal fluid were obviously higher than that in serum (all P <0 01).Dual tube drainage showed a better clinical results compared with single tube drainage.However,there was no significant difference in MDA and SOD levels between two groups(both P >0 05).Conclusions:The level of radicals at the site of brain damage might be one of indexes of degree of severity of the lesion.Dual tube drainage can significantly shorten the duration of unconsciousness of the patient.
关 键 词:脑出血 危重型 血肿抽吸术 侧脑室引流术 自由基
分 类 号:R743.34[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117