检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭庆民[1]
出 处:《教学与研究》2011年第5期69-75,共7页Teaching and Research
摘 要:通过对乔姆斯基等人语言哲学思想的评述,并把他们的思想与福柯等人的批评话语理论进行比较,本文试图说明:限于他们所分析的大部分话语的政治和社会性质,各种批评话语理论夸大了话语结构或意识形态对语言使用和思想自由的束缚,而乔姆斯基等人对语言使用的创造性的论述,能更有效地解释各种新的政治和社会思想产生的语言哲学根源。语言使用的创造性使人们借助有限的语言手段不断生成无限个新的表达式,新的思想伴随这些新的表达式而产生,使我们得以用新的语言和视角来谈论和理解世界并改造世界,满足我们对独创性的心智需要。The paper analyzes the philosophy of language held by Chomsky and others,and compares their philosophy with the basic idea of critical discourse theories advocated by Foucault and others.It suggests that the latter,due to the political and social nature of a substantial part of their discourse data,have largely exaggerated the constraints of discursive structure or ideology on language use and freedom of thought,while the former provide a more reasonable philosophical account of the birth of new political and social ideas.Creative use of language enables its users to employ finite linguistic means to generate an infinite number of new expressions,and,along with these expressions,endless new ideas and thoughts.These new ideas represent new ways of thinking and talking about the world,thus satisfying our mental need for originality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28