检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,北京100875
出 处:《经济经纬》2011年第3期72-76,共5页Economic Survey
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目(09YJA790019);北京师范大学"211工程"三期重点学科建设项目子课题
摘 要:贸易理论的发展以技术差异分析为起点,立足于解释贸易和增长间现实联系,但发展过程中由于对技术的忽略却导致贸易利益的解释偏于狭隘。笔者基于贸易理论解释现实的需要,分析了技术从被忽略到外生处理的原因和局限,探究了现实经济驱动下技术内生化的路径。笔者认为只有把技术与要素禀赋差异、规模经济结合起来,国际贸易理论才可能对贸易动因、贸易模式变动、动态贸易利益等问题做出全面客观的解答。The development of trade theory starts from the analysis of technical difference,intending to interpret the actual connection between trade and growth.However,the neglect of technology in the development process of trade theory led to a narrow and limited explanation of benefit from international trade.Based on the need of trade theory to explain the reality,the authors analyzed the reasons for the neglect of technology and its exogenous disposal and the limitations and explored the path of technology endogenesis driven by the factual economy.The authors believe that only by combining technology with factor endowment difference and economy of scale can trade theory give comprehensive and objective answers to many key questions such as the drive of international trade,variance in trade mode and dynamic trade profit,etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170