辩诉交易与普通程序简易审的比较与反思  

On Summary Trial of General Procedure

作　　者：祁亚平[1] 黄荣昌[1] 

机构地区：[1]甘肃政法学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2011年第2期47-52,共6页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：我国理论界和实务界在2002年至2006年前后对辩诉交易问题进行了极为少见的热烈讨论,并随后建立了普通程序简易审制度。我们收集了辩诉交易的许多材料但是并没有理解辩诉交易的实质,因而导致我们普通程序简易审制度仅仅表现了程序的简化却忽视了权利保护等程序正当化问题。我们必须认识到推动我国普通刑事审判程序正当化改革的难度。不能仅仅只是在制度之间进行极端性的跳跃式选择,必须沿着现有的传统渐进改革,不断推动程序正当化。Whether from the aspect of theory or practice, summary trial of general procedure in criminal cases is in deficiency of theoretic rationality and can not reach the purpose of improving efficiency as well. Summary trial of general procedure applies to public prosecution of first instance which the defendant may be sentenced to three years fixed-term imprisonment or more. Compare with the plea bargaining, we should find the core meaning ： the will of the parties. As with any plea agreement, the court must first determine that the agreement is acceptable, in accordance with the policies stated in plea agreements.

关 键 词：辩诉交易 诉讼结构 普通程序简易审 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]