解读无人领会的语言——医疗侵权诉讼举证责任分配规则评析  

The Interpretation of the Language Nobody Understands: Concerning the Allocation Rules of Burden of Proof in Medical Tort Litigation

作　　者：胡学军[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2011年第3期98-106,共9页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：我国通说对《民事诉讼证据的若干规定》中关于医疗侵权诉讼案件举证责任的规定存在重大误解。医疗侵权诉讼的证明责任只能由患方承担,对此类案件证明的困境应参照西方国家通过使证明责任负担与提供证据责任负担分离的机制及特定要件事实的证明责任与特定证明标准相挂钩的机制来加以化解。In China, There are significant misunderstandings about the burden of proof in medical malpractice litigation cases. The burden of proof in medical tort action shall be borne only by the patient and the plight of proof in such cases may refer to the Western countries via its mechanism that making the burden of proof and the burden of producing evidence separated and be resolved through the mechanism that that the burden of proof in the specific elemental fact linked to the specific standard of proof.

关 键 词：医疗侵权诉讼 举证责任 证明责任 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]