检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南昌大学教育学院 [2]河北省赵县职教中心
出 处:《教育与考试》2011年第2期18-20,57,共4页Education and Examinations
基 金:江西省教育科学"十二五"规划2010年度重点课题"江西省新高考改革方案论证研究"(课题批准号:10ZD085)研究成果之一
摘 要:实证研究认为,文科生与理科生对新高考方案的态度在统考科目的范围与权重、非统考科目的设考方式上表现出显著性差异,在选修模块如何考核、高中学业水平考试如何设考与成绩如何使用、试卷的命制权等问题上体现出较为明显的一致性。文科生和理科生希望"高中学业水平考试"和"语文、数学、外语满分相同"两个问题做出改革的态度最为强烈。文科生和理科生对选修模块如何考核和新高考方案宣传途径两个问题的选择均呈现出多元化的特征。比较而言,文科生比理科生更希望新高考方案做出变革。Empirical study suggests that,liberal art or science students' attitudes for the scheme of entrance examination show significant differences on scope and weighing of universal courses or locating exam methods of non-universal courses,and reflect relatively obvious consistency on how to test elective course module、how to locate high school standard exam or use that score、examination paper's right of proposition and other questions.Both liberal art students and science students' attitudes which want to reform two problem that "high school standard exam" and "the full of Chinese、mask and English must be same" are most strong.And their choosing for how to test elective course module and publicity form of the new scheme are both showing the diversity feature.Comparatively speaking,art students are more hope than science students to change the new scheme of college entrance examination.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38