“枉法仲裁罪”的学理质疑  

Discussing "Law-violating Arbitration"

作　　者：韩平[1] 

机构地区：[1]深圳大学法学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2011年第3期70-74,共5页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(六)》规定了"枉法仲裁罪",旨在监督仲裁员,保护当事人的利益。然而,该罪名的设立带来了难以解决的问题和无法避免的负面影响,包括违背仲裁本质、难以准确定罪、破坏"一裁终局"、打击仲裁员积极性,以及有损我国仲裁国际形象等。可见,"枉法仲裁罪"的设立弊大于利。因此,完善我国"贿赂罪"的相关规定,惩治仲裁员受贿、索贿行为,才是更为可取的做法。The sixth amendment to the Criminal Law of the People＇s Republic of China has established the criminality of ＇Law-violating Arbitration＇,in order to regulate arbitrators and protect the lawsuit parties＇ legal interests.However,the ＇Law-violating Arbitration＇ article brings several necessary problems and adverse effects,including difficulties in judging whether an arbitral award is law-bending,how to deal with law-bending behaviors in foreign-related arbitration and foreign arbitration,and other adverse effects on arbitrators and the international image of Chinese arbitration.In a word,turning ＇Law-Violating Arbitration＇ into a criminal offence is not a good way to regulate arbitrators.Laying down clear provisions against bribery of arbitrators would be a more reasonable and effective way.

关 键 词：仲裁员责任 枉法裁决 仲裁员贿赂 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]