检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李彦博[1] 宋三泰[1] 汤仲明[1] 江泽飞[1] 刘晓睛[1] 徐建明[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军307医院,北京100039
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床与康复》1999年第5期1-5,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
摘 要:目的确定具有高危复发转移倾向的病人.给他们实施积极而合理的治疗,以改善他们的预后。方法回顾性地分析了188例脏窝淋巴结阳性,术后接受CMFVP辅助化疗的Ⅰ、Ⅱ期乳癌病人。观察的终点指标为5年无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)。考虑分析的因素包括年龄、月经状态、病程、原发肿瘤大小、雌激素受体状态、阳性腑窝淋巴结数量。结果对DFS和OS有预后意义的两个因素是原发肿瘤大小和阳性腋窝淋巴结数量。传统的T1和T2之间比较,预后无明显差别。但把肿瘤的大小由2cm改为3cm为观察界限,肿瘤的大小将是非常明显的预后因素。T≤3cm的病人的5年DFS和OS分别是71.3%和83.2%,而T>3cm的病人5年DFS和OS分别是48.3%(P<0.01)和62.6%(P<0.01)。将这两个不良的预后因素按T>3cm和N+≥4把病人分成三组,Ⅰ组是没有以上两个因素;Ⅱ组是只有其中一个不良的因素;Ⅲ组是同时具有两个不良因素。三组病人的5年DFS分别为78.3%、59.2%、28.4%(P<0.05)。5年OS分别为86.2%、74.3%、40.0%(P<0.05)。结论我们的分析证实了传统预后指标的意义,同时也发现,肿瘤直径>3cm是一个不良的预后因素,它不依赖于阳性淋巴结的数目.这提示我们在设计和分析临床试验。Objective To identify patients who are at high risk of relapse and metastases and to offer them a more optimal and aggressive treatment and improve their prognosis. Methods A retrospective analysis of prognostic factors was performed in 188 consecutive node-positive (N+ ) Ⅰ、Ⅱ stage breast cancer patients treated with CMFVP adjuvant chemotherapy. Actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined according to age, menopausal status, size of primary tumor(T). tumor location, hormonal receptor status .number of N+. Results Two prognostic factors for DFS and OS were number of N+ and T size. A comparison between traditionally classified TI and T2 patients revealed no significant difference, but when the cut-off point was shifted from 2cm to 3 cm, T size represented a highly significant prognostic factor. In patients with T less than or equal to 3cm 5-year DFS was 71. 3 % and 5-year OS was 83. 2 %,while in patients with T greater than 3cm,the respective values were 48. 3 % (P<0. 001 )and 62. 6 % (P<0. 001 ). Two adverse variables, T greater than 3cm,number of N+ greater or equal to 4,were used to divide our patients into three subsets with significantly different DFS: Group Ⅰ,with none of the above factors; Group Ⅱ, with only one factor present; and Group Ⅲ,with two factors present, 5-year DFS were 78. 3%, 59. 2 % and 28.4 %, respectively. (P<0. 05 ); 5-year OS were 86. 2 %. 74. 3 %, 40. 0 %, respectively, (P<0. 05 ). Conclusion Our results confirm the great value of classical prognostic factors in node-positive Ⅰ、Ⅱ stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and our data indicate that the diameter of tumor exceeding 3cm is an adverse prognostic factor,no matter how many number of N+ present,and tumors with diameter exceeding 3 cm deserves consideration in analysis and prospective trial.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28