检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:项新华[1,2] 赵素娟[2] 田佩瑶[2] 孙炎[2] 穆效群[2] 贺雄[2] 肖良
机构地区:[1]中国药品生物制品检定所质量管理处,北京100050 [2]北京市疾病预防控制中心 [3]国家认证认可监督管理委员会
出 处:《中国公共卫生》2011年第6期810-812,共3页Chinese Journal of Public Health
基 金:国家认证认可监督委员会专项基金资助项目(CNCA-2008-A09)
摘 要:目的用外部质量控制考核方法评价各实验室铁、锰检测能力。方法将全部实验室分成3组,每组约60个实验室,分割水平样品对设计,采用稳健统计方法结合专家评议对实验室能力进行评价。结果全国30个省(直辖市、自治区)的180个实验室参加了本次能力验证,获得满意结果的有127家,占70.56%,可疑结果的有16家,占8.88%,不满意结果的有37家,占20.56%;建委系统实验室满意率最高为83.3%;东中西部地区实验室满意率分别为71.75%、71.42%和66.67%。除水利系统实验室外,参加考核的6个行业实验室铁锰检测能力差异无统计学意义;东中西部参加能力验证的实验室铁锰检测能力差异无统计学意义。结论参加本次能力验证的实验室,大多数具有铁和锰检测能力。Objective To evaluate the proficiency for iron and magnesium determination of labs in China with methods of external quality control.Methods The labs under the survey were divided into 3 groups(60 in each group).Split level design was used and lab proficiency was evaluated with robust statistical methods combined with expert comments.Results Totally 180 labs from 30 provinces(municipals and autonomous regions) participated in the proficiency test(PT).There were 70.56% of the labs(127) with satisfactory result,8.88%(16) with questionable result,and 20.56%(37) with dissatisfactory result.The rate of satisfactory result for construction sector was the highest(83.3%).The ratio of labs with satisfactory result for east area of China was 71.75%,71.42% for middle area,and 66.67% for west area.Conclusion Most labs participating in the PT had good competence in analyzing iron and magnesium.Rate of satisfactory result was not significantly different among the labs from 6 sectors.The proficiency for iron and magnesium determination of different areas was not significantly different.
分 类 号:R155.51[医药卫生—营养与食品卫生学] TS207.7[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.28.3