腹腔镜下鞘膜内子宫切除术与经腹子宫切除术术式比较  被引量:4

Comparison between classic intrafascial semm hysterectomy under laparoscope and total abdominal hysterectomy

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:高卫辉[1] 谈珍瑜[1] 梁海梅[2] 

机构地区:[1]湖南中医药大学第一附属医院,湖南长沙410007 [2]湖南中医药大学,湖南长沙410007

出  处:《中国内镜杂志》2011年第5期519-521,524,共4页China Journal of Endoscopy

摘  要:目的探讨腹腔镜下鞘膜内子宫切除术(CISH)与经腹子宫切除术(TAH)的临床效果。方法对2008年1月~2010年5月该院采用腹腔镜下鞘膜内子宫切除(CISH)病例45例(研究组),并与同期经腹子宫切除(TAH)43例(对照组),比较两种术式的手术并发症、手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、住院时间。结果 CISH并发症明显低于TAH,经腹腔镜下子宫切除术较经腹子宫切除术时间短,经腹腔镜子宫切除术术中出血少、术后肛门排气时间早,恢复快。结论腹腔镜下鞘膜内子宫切除术,手术创伤小,恢复快,值得临床应用。[Objective] To explore the clinical outcomes of classic intrafascial semm hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy(TAH). [Methods] By comparing the complications, time, blood loss, time of gas passage by anus postoperation, length of hospital between 45 patients with CISH(test group) and 43 patients with TAH(controlled group) in our hospital during January2008 and May2010. [Results] Compared with TAH, patients with CISH had obviously lower incidence rate of complication less surgery time, less blood loss, earlier gas passage by anus postoperation, as well as faster recovery. [Conclusions] CISH is of small wound and fast recovery.

关 键 词:腹腔镜下鞘膜内子宫切除术 经腹子宫切除术 

分 类 号:R737.33[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象